Download PDFOpen PDF in browser

Surgeon vs. semi-automated software measured assessment of glenoid retroversion

4 pagesPublished: December 13, 2022

Abstract

Preoperative anatomic measurements in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) influence a surgeon’s decision-making process in deciding treatment options for a given patient. Glenoid retroversion is one of the most significant measurements and can be highly subject to intra- and inter-observer variability in measurement technique. This study compares surgeon measured retroversion values to semi-automated software measured retroversion values on the same 1862 computed tomography scans, showing consistent measurements with an average absolute mean error between the two techniques of 3.1 ± 3.6°

Keyphrases: anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, preoperative planning software, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty

In: Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena, Joshua W Giles and Eric Stindel (editors). Proceedings of The 20th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, vol 5, pages 73-76.

BibTeX entry
@inproceedings{CAOS2022:Surgeon_vs._semi_automated,
  author    = {Alexander T. Greene and Clément Daviller and Sandrine V. Polakovic and Noah Davis and Christopher Roche},
  title     = {Surgeon vs. semi-automated software measured assessment of glenoid retroversion},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of The 20th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery},
  editor    = {Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena and Joshua W Giles and Eric Stindel},
  series    = {EPiC Series in Health Sciences},
  volume    = {5},
  publisher = {EasyChair},
  bibsource = {EasyChair, https://easychair.org},
  issn      = {2398-5305},
  url       = {/publications/paper/JcqS},
  doi       = {10.29007/x2v4},
  pages     = {73-76},
  year      = {2022}}
Download PDFOpen PDF in browser