Ethical Dilemmas in Leadership: Navigating Between Utilitarian and Deontological Perspectives

EasyChair Preprint 14378

Abstract

Ethical dilemmas are a constant challenge in leadership, where decisions can have far-reaching consequences for individuals, organizations, and society. This paper explores the complexities leaders face when navigating these dilemmas through the lenses of two prominent moral theories: Utilitarianism and Deontological Ethics. Utilitarianism advocates for decisions that maximize happiness or utility, emphasizing outcomes and the greater good. In contrast, Deontological Ethics focuses on adherence to moral duties and principles, valuing actions' inherent rightness or wrongness regardless of their consequences.

The analysis delves into how these ethical frameworks influence decision-making in leadership, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each approach. Utilitarianism offers flexibility and a results-oriented perspective but risks overlooking individual rights and ethical concerns about justifying harm. Deontological Ethics provides consistency and respect for moral integrity but may struggle with rigidity and conflicts between duties.

Through comparative analysis and real-world case studies, this paper illustrates the practical challenges and implications of applying these theories in leadership. It underscores the importance of context, ethical awareness, and critical thinking in navigating complex ethical dilemmas. Ultimately, it advocates for a balanced approach, where leaders integrate both utilitarian and deontological perspectives to make informed and morally sound decisions.

Keyphrases: Collective Good, deontological ethics, ethical decision-making, individual rights, utilitarianism

@booklet{EasyChair:14378,
  author    = {Docas Akinyele},
  title     = {Ethical Dilemmas in Leadership: Navigating Between Utilitarian and Deontological Perspectives},
  howpublished = {EasyChair Preprint 14378},
  year      = {EasyChair, 2024}}