Download PDFOpen PDF in browserUse of a Fluoroscopy-Based Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty System Produced Greater Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes at One Year Compared to Manual, Fluoroscopic-Assisted Technique8 pages•Published: December 17, 2024AbstractIntroduction: The adoption of new technology should be supported by improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). The purpose of this study was to assess the one-year PROMs of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a novel, fluoroscopy-based, robotic-assisted (RA-THA) system when compared to a manual, fluoroscopic-assisted technique (mTHA).Materials and methods: A review of 91 consecutive mTHA and 85 consecutive RA-THA via a direct anterior approach was conducted. All cases were performed by the same surgeon at the same institution, for a pre-operative diagnosis of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Outcomes included one-year Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) Physical/Mental, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome (HOOS) Pain/Physical Function/Joint Replacement, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity scores, as well as the difference between pre-operative and one-year post-operative PROMs. Results: Patients in the RA-THA cohort had lower pre-operative HOOS-JR scores compared to patients in the mTHA cohort (37.0 vs. 43.1; p=0.031). Cohorts experienced similar one-year post-operative VR-12, HOOS, and UCLA Activity scores. Patients in the RA-THA cohort experienced greater improvements across all pre- and post-operative HOOS scores compared to patients in the mTHA cohort: Pain (+54.7 vs. +42.1; p=0.009), Physical Function (-41.6 vs. -28.7; p=0.007), and Joint Replacement (+46.6 vs. +33.0; p=0.002). These differences exceeded minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Conclusions: Both manual and robotic cohorts experienced benefit from THA at one-year post-operative. Importantly, the use of a novel, fluoroscopy-based robotic assistance system for primary THA resulted in greater improvements in PROMs at one-year relative to manual technique. Keyphrases: arthroplasty, hip, patient reported outcome measures, robotic assisted surgery In: Joshua W Giles and Aziliz Guezou-Philippe (editors). Proceedings of The 24th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, vol 7, pages 45-52.
|